Cornwall Council (23 002 394)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Jun 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Mr X’s reports of unsafe working practices at his local supermarket. This is because an investigation is unlikely to find fault by the Council and because the injustice claimed by Mr X is insufficient to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Mr X, complains the Council has not done enough to address public safety at his local supermarket where he says he has avoided four near misses due to a hazard caused by floor brushing.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council, including its response to his complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about its inadequate response to reports of near-misses he said he had had in his local supermarket over a number of years involving the use of brushes.
  2. The Council explained to Mr X that the incidents he had reported were not at a level which required further action beyond it contacting the store to establish whether it had investigated the near misses Mr X had reported which the store had confirmed it had.
  3. We do not investigate every complaint we receive. We are funded by the public purse and have an obligation to use the funds allocated to us in an effective, efficient and economic manner. This means that we will not investigate complaints where neither fault by the Council nor the injustice claimed by the complainant are at a level which warrant the use of our resources.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation is unlikely to find fault by the Council and because the injustice claimed by Mr X is insufficient to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings