London Borough of Harrow (25 027 014)

Category : Environment and regulation > Noise

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council issuing a warning to Mr X about noise from a drain outside his property. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council issued him a warning regarding noise from a drain outside his property, which he says is normal household noise. Mr X says this has caused him significant distress. He wants the Council to acknowledge a statutory nuisance does not include every possible source of noise. Mr X also wants an explanation on how sending the notice was justified despite no officer witnessing the noise.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In December 2025, the Council wrote to Mr X to tell him it had received a complaint about noise alleged to be coming from his property. The Council explained it had not witnessed the noise and said the purpose of the letter was to make him aware of the complaint. It also said the reported noise had since stopped and gave Mr X an opportunity to respond.
  2. The Council’s process for dealing with noise complaints includes contacting the person alleged to be responsible for the noise. The evidence shows the Council followed that process and gave Mr X an opportunity to respond. There is therefore insufficient evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings