Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Westminster City Council (24 010 924)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 28-Nov-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Mr X’s reports of noise nuisance and traffic issues in his locale. This is because the complaint is a late complaint due to the passage of time and so falls outside our jurisdiction.
-
Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (24 004 591)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 25-Nov-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about complaint about noise nuisance since 2022. The complaint is late. We have seen no reason why the complainant could not have come to use much sooner.
-
Wakefield City Council (23 020 611)
Statement Upheld Noise 21-Nov-2024
Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to act on noise nuisance from nearby allotments. We found the Council took suitable steps to investigate the noise and acted against the allotment tenants responsible. The Council accepted fault for not acting promptly on further evidence Mr X gave, but we found this did not affect the outcome or cause significant injustice.
-
Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council (24 010 216)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 14-Nov-2024
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to continue with a complaint he made about a noise nuisance. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.
-
Luton Borough Council (24 009 503)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 06-Nov-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council has dealt with reports of a noise nuisance from the operation of a telecoms mast. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault causing the complainant a significant injustice.
-
Stoke-on-Trent City Council (24 008 259)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 06-Nov-2024
Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of his reports of anti-social behaviour by his neighbours. We will not investigate the complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council sufficient to warrant an investigation and because it has proposed a way forward to further investigate matters.
-
Epping Forest District Council (24 009 404)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 05-Nov-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s complaints of noise nuisance. This is because past events fall outside our jurisdiction due to the passage of time and there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation in relation to more recent events.
-
Bristol City Council (24 013 105)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 01-Nov-2024
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council not taking any action to resolve the excessive noise made by his neighbour. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.
-
Dover District Council (24 010 060)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 01-Nov-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a noise complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council and some issues are late.
-
Hyndburn Borough Council (24 009 077)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 29-Oct-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to reopen a previously investigated noise nuisance complaint. This is because there is no evidence to suggest fault by the Council.