Somerset Council (24 020 239)

Category : Environment and regulation > Noise

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the how the Council dealt with a noise complaint. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council has not provided support when he reported noise coming from a neighbouring property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X told the Council about the noise issue he was experiencing in 2024.
  2. The Council acknowledged the concern and asked Mr X to use a noise recording app and keep a noise diary for a month.
  3. Mr X complained to the Council in November 2024. He said he didn’t know where the noise was coming from, and he was not happy with the actions he had been asked to take.
  4. In its complaints responses the Council said it needed to assess the noise to decide if it met the threshold for a statutory noise nuisance. It explained what a statutory noise nuisance is. It said the app recordings showed the noise to be at different times of the day and so it would be difficult for the Council to witness. It also advised Mr X he should not specifically open a window to record noises.
  5. The Council told Mr X it had liaised with the responsible housing association, and they were going to install noise recording equipment when it became available.
  6. The law says a council must take reasonable steps to investigate reports of noise disturbance. The Council reviewed Mr X’s noise recordings, provided advice to Mr X and is working with the responsible housing association. We will not investigate further because there is insufficient evidence of fault with the Council’s response to Mr X’s reports.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint, there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings