Southampton City Council (22 015 085)

Category : Environment and regulation > Noise

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Mar 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Ms X’s reports of noise nuisance from neighbours. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Ms X, says the Council has refused to investigate and take action in relation to her complaints of noise nuisance from neighbours living above her. She says its refusal to assist her is discrimination and a breach of her human rights.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’ which we call ‘fault’. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in the decision making, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained to the Council about noise nuisance from neighbours living above her. The Council investigated, reviewed the information it held on file and clarified details with Ms X but having done so it decided the type of noise Ms X complained about was everyday living noise and not a statutory noise nuisance against which it could take action.
  2. While Ms X may be disappointed with the Council’s decision, it is not our role to act as a point of appeal. We cannot question decisions taken by councils if they have followed the right steps and considered the relevant evidence and information. The Council satisfied itself it was able to make a decision on Ms X’s case without the collection of any further information or the installation of noise recording equipment. There is no evidence to suggest fault affected its decision.
  3. Ms X complains about discrimination and a breach of her human rights but no evidence has been provided to support her allegations or to suggest that such issues are engaged here.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings