Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council (22 003 103)

Category : Environment and regulation > Noise

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Sep 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s response to the problems of daily noise and smells he has reported coming from a neighbouring property. We will not investigate the complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Mr X, says he feels he has been fobbed off by the Council’s Building Control and Planning departments in connection with noise and smells he has reported coming from the refurbished property next to his.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I gave Mr X the opportunity to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about everyday noise and smells he was experiencing coming from the property next to his which had been newly refurbished.
  2. The Council explained that it had no grounds to take action under its planning or building control powers as the property was not a new build but a refurbished property. Its Community Protection team visited but, having investigated, it advised Mr X it could not assist either and suggested he might consider taking his own private legal action and look to the Party Wall Act.
  3. At the time of the Council’s response to Mr X’s complaint, the tenants living at the property had moved out and the Council has said it will review its position if further issues are raised following the moving in of new tenants.
  4. While I understand Mr X has been distressed by the problems he has experienced, I have seen no evidence to suggest there has been fault by the Council. It has no grounds to take enforcement action under planning law or building control regulations and it has advised it will revisit the case if the same problems arise when new tenants move in.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings