City of Wolverhampton Council (25 032 077)

Category : Environment and regulation > Licensing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse Mr X’s taxi license application. This is because it was reasonable to expect Mr X to use his right to appeal to the magistrate’s court, and in any event, we cannot achieve the outcome he wants.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s decision to refuse his application for a taxi license. He says because of this he is unable to provide for his family. Mr X wants the Council to grant the license.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to have gone to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. When a council refuses a licence, the applicant has a right of appeal to the magistrates’ court. The evidence shows the Council told Mr X about this appeal right in March 2026. The Ombudsman would usually expect someone to use such an appeal right, unless it would be unreasonable to do so. Mr X has not provided any reasons why it would have been unreasonable for him to appeal to the court.
  2. For this reason, we will not investigate the complaint. In any event, we could not achieve the outcome Mr X wants, which is for the Council to grant the licence. It is for the court, not the Ombudsman, to decide whether the Council properly considered the licence application.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect him to appeal to the magistrate’s court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings