Durham County Council (25 021 612)

Category : Environment and regulation > Licensing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a selective licence issued by the Council. Mr X had a right of appeal to the First-Tier Tribunal about this issue, and it would be reasonable to expect him to have used it.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about a selective licence issued by the Council for his rental property. Mr X said the Council issued the licence for 18 months, although he had been told it would be issued for five years.
  2. Mr X said this impacted him financially.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained the Council issued the selective licence for a shorter period than he sought.
  2. The Housing Act 2004 says a selective licence holder, within 28 days of the Council’s decision to issue the licence, can appeal to the First-Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) about the conditions of it. This includes the length of time it has been issued for.
  3. It would be reasonable for Mr X to have used this right because it is set out in law, and the Tribunal can tell the Council to grant the licence on different terms. We cannot tell the Council to do so.
  4. As outlined in paragraph four, we cannot investigate complaints where a person has a right of appeal to a Tribunal and where we expect it reasonable for them to have used it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he had a right of appeal to a Tribunal and it would have been reasonable to expect him to have used it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings