Transport for London (25 019 249)

Category : Environment and regulation > Licensing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the delay in TfL approving Mr X’s application for a private hire vehicle licence. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to result in a worthwhile outcome for him.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained TfL has unnecessarily delayed approving his application for a private hire vehicle licence.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Authority.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained TfL has delayed approving his application for a private hire vehicle licence and required him to take assessments he had already taken.
  2. TfL apologised for the delay and explained the process can take between 4 and 6 months but had been affected by a cyber incident. TfL’s policy allows it to request that applicants retake assessments if it considers this necessary.
  3. Mr X is unhappy with TfL’s actions and wants us to find it at fault. There is no set timescale for the private hire vehicle process, and it can be delayed for any number of reasons. TfL has experienced a cyber incident which has affected its processing times. There is nothing to suggest TfL is at fault for the delay this has created. An investigation would be unlikely to provide the outcome Mr X seeks.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation would be unlikely to result in a worthwhile outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings