City of Wolverhampton Council (25 018 789)

Category : Environment and regulation > Licensing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal of Mr X’s private hire licence application as Mr X could have appealed this decision in court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s refusal of his private hire licence application. Mr X says he no longer wishes to be licensed by the Council but requests an investigation into its consideration of his application to check for fault.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate how the Council considered Mr X’s application as the law has provided an appeal process in court by which an applicant can challenge a refusal decision. The court is best placed to consider this matter.
  2. I recognise that Mr X says he no longer wishes to be licensed. As such, there is effectively no significant outstanding injustice caused to him that would justify our further involvement. The injustice to Mr X is the licence refusal and the remedy for this is the court appeal. We will not therefore investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the licence refusal is best addressed in court, and if Mr X is no longer wishing to be licensed, then any remaining injustice caused to him is not sufficient to warrant our further involvement, in any case.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings