London Borough of Haringey (25 013 277)

Category : Environment and regulation > Licensing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council serving a financial penalty for non-registration of a rented property within a selective licensing scheme. Mr X has exercised his right to appeal the penalty and listing on a rogue landlord’s register to the Residential Property Tribunal and we cannot investigate further.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council telling him in September 2024 that he did not have a licence for a property which he rents out privately. He says he was not given sufficient time to apply and that the Council ignored his communication. He says the Council should withdraw the £1,000 penalty it issued and remove him from its register of rogue landlords and apologise for its errors.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal or a government minister or started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6), as amended)
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X is a private landlord and in 2024 he was informed by the Council that he did not have a licence for a rental property which is located within a selective licensing zone. The Council said it has operated the licensing scheme since 2022 and that as a landlord he should be aware of the regulations and the legal requirement to have a licence.
  2. Mr X says the Council delayed in issuing a licence when he applied in March 2025. The Council issued Mr X with a Financial penalty warning in February because it says he had not applied by then. The penalty was for £1,000 although the maximum penalty is up to £30,000. It also told him he would be added to the register of rogue landlords once the penalty was issued. Financial penalties under the Housing Act 2004 provisions carry a right of appeal to the residential Property Tribunal which is part of the First-Tier courts tribunals. Mr X submitted an appeal to the Tribunal.
  3. We cannot investigate complaints once an appeal is submitted to a Tribunal, regardless of the outcome of the appeal. We have no jurisdiction to consider Mr X’s complaint because he appealed.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council serving a financial penalty for non-registration of a rented property within a selective licensing scheme. Mr X has exercised his right to appeal the penalty and listing on a rogue landlord’s register to the Residential Property Tribunal and we cannot investigate further.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings