Birmingham City Council (24 017 074)

Category : Environment and regulation > Licensing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about how the Council responded to her reports of noise and other nuisance. It is unlikely we would find fault in the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. Miss X made repeated complaints to the Council about noise and other nuisance that she was experiencing, which she said was caused by a neighbour. She said the Council did not listen to her reports or act and did not discuss her case with her landlord. She said this caused her distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council relating to its actions in 2024. I have not considered information about how the Council responded to Miss X’s reports in 2025.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In 2024, Miss X made numerous reports about noise and other nuisance related issues. She said the Council did not listen to her or take action. She also said the Council were at fault because it did not liaise with her landlord or consider her evidence.
  2. The Council provided me with the case notes relating to Miss X’s reports about nuisance in 2024. The notes show it carried out several visits to the property complained about, in line with reports it received, and checked for evidence relating to Miss X’s reports.
  3. Additionally, it wrote to the property where the noise was alleged to have occurred, as well as other occupants of Miss X’s block. The Council also discussed Miss X’s case with her landlord. The Council’s records show it wrote to Miss X and told her why it was closing her case.
  4. The Council’s website says that when a report of noise nuisance, it will contact the person making the complaint and the person who the complaint is being made about. It says it try to gather evidence where it can.
  5. Given the Council’s actions here, which are recorded in the case notes, it is unlikely we would find fault in its actions.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because the evidence shows the Council responded to her complaints and it is unlikely we would find fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings