Bristol City Council (22 017 495)

Category : Environment and regulation > Licensing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Apr 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council failed to issue a refund for a private hire licence fee payment that was made twice. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will call Mr X, complains that the Council has failed to refund his business for a private hire licence fee payment that was taken twice.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. An employee of Mr X made a payment on the Council’s website to renew one of Mr X’s companies private hire licences. Due to an issue with the website the payment of £193 was made twice. The employee therefore asked the Council to refund the second payment.
  2. I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. The Council has provided evidence showing that a cheque was sent in the name of Mr X’s business and that the cheque was cashed. Therefore I am satisfied that the Council has evidenced that a refund was provided.
  3. Mr X says the refund was not received. However, this is a matter he will need to raise with his bank. If he believes the cheque was stolen and deposited into another account he will need to raise this with the police.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of faut by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings