London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (22 009 080)

Category : Environment and regulation > Licensing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Oct 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with the suspension of parking bays outside the complainant’s home. This is because there is insufficient evidence that the matter has caused the complainant a significant personal injustice.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will call Mrs X, complains about how the Council dealt with an application to suspend parking in bays outside her property. Mrs X says the bays were blocked for a number of weeks before permission was given and the Council should make the business pay parking fees for this period.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.
  1. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. A local business installed decking on two parking bays outside its premises. It subsequently applied for a pavement licence which was approved. An application was then submitted to suspend the parking bays which was also approved. Mrs X feels the Council should make the business pay the parking suspension fees from when it first installed the decking.
  2. I will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. Whilst she feels strongly that the Council should backdate the fees, this is a matter between the Council and the business. Any decision the Council makes in relation to these fees does not cause Mrs X a significant personal injustice.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is no evidence the Council’s actions have caused her a significant personal injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings