South Cambridgeshire District Council (21 005 018)

Category : Environment and regulation > Licensing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Aug 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council refuses to act against a business which the complainant says is breaching the conditions on a pavement licence. We have not seen evidence of fault in the way the Council responded to the complaints.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, I shall call B, says the Council:
    • should not have granted a pavement licence to the café next door to their home
    • failed to act following their reports the café is breaching the licence conditions; and
    • failed to act on the reports the café is breaching social distancing rules
    • failed to act on reports of noise

They want the pavement license revoked.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A (6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by B and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In response to B’s complaints the Council confirms it has:
    • made unannounced visits to the café and found no breaches of the license and is satisfied it is working in a Covid safe manner
    • advised B what evidence it requires to consider a noise complaint – he has declined to progress the matter
    • received no reports of concern from either the Police or the Highways Authority about parking or highway safety matters
  2. We cannot question the merits of a decision on whether the café is breaching the pavement license conditions unless there is evidence of fault in the way it was reached.
  3. In this case, different officers from the Council’s environmental health team and licensing team. Officers from the Highways Authority have also visited the site. They reached a professional judgement that there was no breach of the licence conditions or Covid regulations. This is the process we would expect to see before the Council makes a decision on whether the pavement license has been breached. I can see no fault in the way this decision was reached.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not investigate this complaint. This is because it does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings