What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Nottingham City Council (25 020 900)

Category : Environment and regulation > Health and safety

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s health and safety complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of his health and safety complaint. He said this has had a serious impact on his mental health. Mr X wants the Council to acknowledge its investigation was flawed, apologise and have a senior officer with no previous involvement reconsider it.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X reported health and safety concerns to the Council, including alleged legal breaches by the company. The Council noted he had already raised concerns with the company and was pursuing a personal injury claim. It explained it could not investigate allegations of bullying, signposted him to equality and human rights services, and contacted the company for relevant health and safety documents.
  2. The Council said the company did not initially provide its risk assessments, so it considered whether enforcement action was needed. After further contact, the company provided its current assessment, which the Council considered met the required standards.
  3. We understand Mr X is unhappy the Council considered documents produced after its involvement. But there is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council reached its decision. It considered Mr X’s concerns, reviewed the relevant documents, and signposted him to the appropriate services. This is what we would expect and the Council was entitled to take the approach it did.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings