Manchester City Council (25 003 086)

Category : Environment and regulation > Health and safety

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about unsafe street furniture in a public space. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has refused to remove unsafe street furniture from its public spaces following an incident. He says this has caused distress and puts the public at risk. He wants the Council to refer the matter to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and remove the street furniture.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council following an incident in a Council- managed public space. He said an element of street furniture installed by the Council was dangerous and had caused personal injury. He asked the Council to investigate and remove the street furniture.
  2. In its complaint responses, the Council said it had received no other reports of incidents or injuries related to the street furniture since it was installed several years previously. It said although it was sorry to hear about the incident, it did not consider it needed to take any further action and did not propose to remove the street furniture from the public space.
  3. It told Mr X that if he wished to make a personal injury claim, he could do so through the Council’s legal team.
  4. We will not investigate this complaint. The Council has appropriately considered that matter but decided not to take further action. This is a decision the Council is entitled to reach. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation. We could not require it to remove the street furniture or refer the matter to HSE.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings