Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council (22 013 379)

Category : Environment and regulation > Drainage

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Feb 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage to the complainant’s property caused by flooding from land the Council owns. This is because the complaint is made late and because matters of liability are for insurers and then the courts.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will call Mrs X, complains that her property has been damaged because of flooding on a Council owned field to the rear of her property. Mrs X says the matter has been going on since 2016 and has caused damage in her garden and will eventually cause damage to the foundations of her property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained to the Council about the flooding in April 2022. The Council acknowledges that the field behind her property floods but says homeowners are responsible for drainage on their land and suggested measures Mrs X could make to alleviate the problems.
  2. I will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. The issue of flooding started some eight or nine years ago. I see no reason why Mrs X could not have complained to the Council and then the Ombudsman sooner.
  3. Even if Mrs X had complained sooner, we still would not have investigated her complaint. This is because it is reasonable for Mrs X to take the Council to court if she believes it is responsible for her garden flooding and the damage to her property. Only the courts can decide upon matters of liability.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is made late and is a matter for the courts.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings