North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council (21 018 030)

Category : Environment and regulation > Drainage

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about water run-off from a housing development. It was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mrs X could not have complained to us sooner.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about the Council’s failure to take sufficient action over water run-off from a housing development which received planning approval in 2015. She says she has been complaining to the Council since 2018 but the matter remains unresolved.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X objected to plans which were submitted for a housing development on higher land than her own property in 2015 when the planning notices were advertised. In 2017 the land was developed for housing and the following year she says her garden began to be swamped by run-off which she says is due to the development.
  2. She complained to the Council at the time, and it informed her that the drainage condition on the plans had been discharged following completion to the approved design. This was endorsed by the water authority which was a statutory consultee in the planning process. The Council opened an enforcement file, but this was closed in 2018 because there was no breach of planning control.
  3. Mrs X has continued to complain, and the Council has advised her that it cannot take further action over the development. It advised her that she would need to consider a legal remedy against the developer because it is a civil matter between two private parties.
  4. We will not normally investigate complaints about matters which the person affected has been aware of for more than 12 months before complaining to us. This restriction applies to Mrs X’s complaint and there is no evidence to suggest that Mrs X could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about water run-off from a housing development. It was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mrs X could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings