Sunderland City Council (24 007 772)

Category : Environment and regulation > Cemeteries and crematoria

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint relating to Mrs X’s family member’s grave plots. Parts of the complaint are matters we already considered and decided in 2019, and others are late with no good reason for the delay in complaining to the Ombudsman.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council:
    • exhumed a family member’s remains to place another family member’s remains in the plot;
    • sold the family four plots under false pretences, knowing there was insufficient space; and
    • acted deceptively and wrongly treated her as vexatious.
  2. Mrs X said the matter caused her significant distress. She did not say what outcome she sought from complaining to us.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

Parts of the complaint we already considered and decided

  1. Mrs X’s complaint includes challenges to our previous decision of 2019. That decision related to her complaint the Council exhumed a family member's remains to place another family member in the plot.
  2. I will not consider these points and I will not reconsider matters we already decided. We cannot use a new complaint as a way to circumnavigate our reviews process, and it was open to Mrs X at the time to pursue a judicial review of our decision.
  3. Mrs X stated in her complaint that she has found out new information since our previous decision. I have considered her submission to decide whether there is anything Mrs X says she found out which would give rise to a new, sufficiently separable complaint.
  4. However, the information Mrs X refers to is largely additional information relating to the substantive matters she already brought to us. Had we decided to investigate her complaint in 2019, it would have been for us to decide what information we needed to obtain. I have addressed matters below that are separable from our previous decision.

Parts of the complaint that are late

  1. The law says people should bring complaints to us within 12 months of becoming aware of the matter. Mrs X’s complaint is about events that occurred several years ago.
  2. Mrs X was raising her concern the plot did not have sufficient space for four interments in 2019. The Council’s decision to treat her as a vexatious complainant, which it communicated to her at the time, was in 2021. There is not a good reason for the subsequent delay in Mrs X bringing these matters to us and we will not investigate them now.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is about matters we have already considered and decided, or that are late.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings