Adur District Council (22 006 133)

Category : Environment and regulation > Cemeteries and crematoria

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Aug 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about works the Council carried out at a cemetery because there is no evidence of fault on the Council’s part.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr B, complains that the Council’s staff have damaged trees, hedges and monuments at a cemetery.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr B complained to the Council about work carried out to hedges at a cemetery where he owns a grave. Specifically, he complained that hedges had been reduced in height with the use of chainsaws. He says this has caused damage to the hedges, which will take years to recover. In response to Mr B’s complaint, the Council denied fault.
  2. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault on the Council’s part. Mr B believes the works to the hedges are inappropriate. But that does not mean they amount to fault. It is for the Council’s staff to determine the nature and extent of works to the hedges and it is not for us to substitute our judgement for theirs. There are no grounds for us to intervene.
  3. I have seen no evidence that Mr B has formally complained to the Council about damage to monuments and headstones, so this does not fall to the Ombudsman to consider. Damage to property would, in any case, be a matter between the Council and the property owner.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because there is no evidence of fault on the Council’s part.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings