Mendip District Council (22 005 007)

Category : Environment and regulation > Cemeteries and crematoria

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Jul 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage to a grave because the complainant may pursue the matter in court, and it would be reasonable for her to do so.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mrs B, complains that the Council failed to properly maintain trees at a cemetery, and that this failure caused damage to the grave of a family member.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs B says a fallen tree branch has damaged the grave of a family member. She contends that the Council’s failure to properly maintain the trees at the cemetery led to the damage and that the Council should reimburse her for the cost incurred.
  2. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint. Essentially, the complaint amounts to an allegation that the Council has been negligent, and that this negligence has caused Mrs B financial loss and distress. The Ombudsman cannot determine whether negligence on the Council’s part means it is liable for the damage. This is a matter for the Council’s insurers and, ultimately, for the courts.
  3. Mrs B’s recourse is to make a claim against the Council and, if the Council denies liability, it would be reasonable for her to pursue the matter in court. The Ombudsman will not intervene.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because it would be reasonable for her to pursue the matter in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings