Stoke-on-Trent City Council (21 008 236)

Category : Environment and regulation > Cemeteries and crematoria

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Oct 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council responded after the complainant reported that her child’s grave is being vandalised. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Ms X, complains about the Council’s response after she reported that her child’s grave is being vandalised. Ms X wants the Council to care about the situation and install CCTV.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council. This includes the complaint correspondence. I also considered our Assessment Code and invited Ms X to comment on a draft of this decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X reported to the Council that her child’s grave is being vandalised. The Council apologised for her distress and asked her to report each incident to the police. The Council told Ms X it has asked staff to look out for any suspicious activity and it had liaised with the police. It said it had asked police support officers to patrol the area and its own security staff have been asked to be vigilant when locking up and to report any anti-social behaviour. The Council said it has limited CCTV in the car park but it does not have the resources to extend the CCTV coverage or to provide constant monitoring of the site. It explained that items left on a grave are susceptible to theft or damage which is why it recommends that relatives only have a memorial stone.
  2. I will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. The acts of vandalism are distressing for Ms X and completely unacceptable. But, there is nothing to suggest fault in the Council’s response and it is hard to know what more it could do. I appreciate Ms X would like the Council to extend the CCTV but the Council has explained it does not have the resources and, in any case, there might be privacy issues as some people might not want to be filmed while paying their respects at the graveside.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings