London Borough of Enfield (20 006 153)
Category : Environment and regulation > Cemeteries and crematoria
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 18 Nov 2020
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s charges for the burial of his partner. The Council had no direct involvement with Mr X and if he disputes the charges he should raise the matter with the funeral director.
The complaint
- The complainant, Mr X, complains about the Council’s charges for the burial of his partner (Ms Y) and other services relating to her interment in a council cemetery. He says its charges of more than £1,700 are excessive and that he is not liable to pay the costs.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
- it is unlikely we would find fault, or
- the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
- the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
- it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the Council, or
- it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome, or
- we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.
(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I reviewed Mr X’s complaint and the Council’s response. I shared my draft decision with Mr X and invited his comments.
What I found
- Ms Y sadly died in 2019. Mr X appointed a funeral director to handle the arrangements but says they did not tell him the Council would charge £1,640 to re-open Ms Y’s mother’s grave so that she could be buried in the same plot. Mr X also says he was unaware of the Council’s £95 licence fee to add further engraving to the headstone and says that his brother-in-law should be liable for these costs as he is the owner of the grave.
- Mr X has no direct involvement or contract with the Council for its services. The arrangements for Ms Y’s funeral were decided by Mr X and carried out by the funeral director. It was the funeral director who contracted with the Council and it was their responsibility to inform Mr X of its charges. The Council has not billed Mr X and if Mr X disputes his liability for the charges he would need to take this up with the funeral director and/or his brother-in law.
Final decision
- The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because it is unlikely we would find fault by the Council causing Mr X injustice.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman