London Borough of Enfield (20 006 153)

Category : Environment and regulation > Cemeteries and crematoria

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Nov 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s charges for the burial of his partner. The Council had no direct involvement with Mr X and if he disputes the charges he should raise the matter with the funeral director.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains about the Council’s charges for the burial of his partner (Ms Y) and other services relating to her interment in a council cemetery. He says its charges of more than £1,700 are excessive and that he is not liable to pay the costs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we would find fault, or
  • the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the Council, or
  • it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I reviewed Mr X’s complaint and the Council’s response. I shared my draft decision with Mr X and invited his comments.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Ms Y sadly died in 2019. Mr X appointed a funeral director to handle the arrangements but says they did not tell him the Council would charge £1,640 to re-open Ms Y’s mother’s grave so that she could be buried in the same plot. Mr X also says he was unaware of the Council’s £95 licence fee to add further engraving to the headstone and says that his brother-in-law should be liable for these costs as he is the owner of the grave.
  2. Mr X has no direct involvement or contract with the Council for its services. The arrangements for Ms Y’s funeral were decided by Mr X and carried out by the funeral director. It was the funeral director who contracted with the Council and it was their responsibility to inform Mr X of its charges. The Council has not billed Mr X and if Mr X disputes his liability for the charges he would need to take this up with the funeral director and/or his brother-in law.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because it is unlikely we would find fault by the Council causing Mr X injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings