Bristol City Council (25 020 175)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council has maintained a green space. There is not enough significant personal injustice to Mrs X to warrant investigation, and an investigation is unlikely to lead to a different outcome anyway.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains a green space near her home has become a hub of anti-social behaviour and public health issues. Mrs X says she no longer feels safe visiting it and wants the Council to take greater enforcement action against offensive or unsafe behaviour.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement or further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Our role is to consider complaints where the person bringing the complaint has suffered significant personal injustice as a direct result of the actions or inactions of the organisation. This means we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures.
  2. I recognise this public green space, is important to Mrs X. However, I do not consider there has been significant enough personal injustice to warrant the Ombudsman devoting time and public money to investigation. So, we will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint.
  3. In any event, since Mrs X’s complaint, the Council has taken steps through the court system to address the substantive issues she is concerned about. An investigation by the Ombudsman now would be unlikely to lead to a different outcome because there is no extra action we could recommend the Council take.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough significant personal injustice to Mrs X to warrant investigation, and an investigation is unlikely to lead to a different outcome anyway.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings