Northumberland County Council (25 005 478)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Mr X’s reports concerning anti-social behaviour. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to result in a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council failed to act in response to reports he has made about anti-social behaviour taking place in the local area.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about anti-social behaviour taking place in his local area. He said the Council had been aware of the problem for some time and it had failed to address it. Mr X said he wanted the Council to enforce a public spaces protection order.
  2. The Council investigated Mr X’s complaint and confirmed it had visited the area several times and held multi agency meetings to discuss the problem. The Council said it had considered installing CCTV cameras but as this was not practical, it was seeking legal advice regarding a public spaces protection order.
  3. Mr X remains unhappy with the situation and wants us to find the Council at fault. The evidence shows the Council has acted within its scope to tackle the problem and has conducted a thorough investigation which addresses Mr X’s complaint and details actions it is taking to resolve the issue. These were reasonable actions for the Council to take. An investigation would be unlikely to provide a different result for Mr X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation would be unlikely to result in a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings