Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (24 019 228)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with reports of a light nuisance. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council failed to properly investigate his report of a light nuisance from a neighbouring property. Mr X wants the Council to issue his neighbour with an abatement notice.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We are not an appeal body. We may only criticise a council’s decision where there has been fault in its decision-making process which affected the outcome of the decision.
  2. In responding to Mr X’s concerns, a Council Environmental Health Officer considered Mr X’s reports and carried out a site visit where they viewed the light in question. The Officer concluded it could not issue an abatement notice, because the light did not constitute a statutory nuisance.
  3. I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. I understand Mr X disagrees with the Council’s decision to take no further action. But it is not fault for a council to properly make a decision with which someone disagrees.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings