West Suffolk Council (23 008 530)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Oct 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a high hedge next to the complainant’s home. The Council does not own the trees, so is not responsible for the alleged damage they are causing, and the complainant needs to follow the high hedge complaint process to enable the Council to consider using its anti-social behaviour powers.

The complaint

  1. Miss X says the Council has failed to take action against tall trees on neighbouring land which she says have damaged her property and impact her amenity.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We can investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. So, we do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. And we cannot investigate a complaint where the body complained about is not responsible for the issue being raised. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(1), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council, which included their complaint correspondence.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has explained it does not own the land on which the trees are located. So, with reference to paragraph 4 above, it is not responsible for the property damage Miss X refers to in her complaint. I understand Miss X is pursuing a separate insurance claim against the landowner.
  2. The Council does have other powers, under the Antisocial Behaviour Act 2003, to deal with complaints about high hedges. But Miss X would need to submit a high hedges complaint form to the Council, having first taken all reasonable steps to try to settle the dispute with the landowner. So, with reference to paragraph 3 above, we will not investigate this part of the complaint now, as Miss X needs to go through the high hedge complaint process first.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because the Council does not own the tree being complained about, and she needs to follow its high hedges complaint process first.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings