Chesterfield Borough Council (22 016 586)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Jun 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council issuing Mr X’s family with a community protection notice. This is because an investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council issuing his family with a community protection notice over a boundary dispute between a neighbour. He says this was despite the Council providing him with advice that they could park where they were parking.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X was involved with a boundary dispute with his neighbour over the parking of their cars. The Council originally told Mr X that he could park where he was parking. However, the Council later issued Mr X with a community protection notice (CPN) over his parking.
  2. During its complaint investigation, the Council accepted it provided incorrect advice to Mr X regarding where he could park and provided confirmation of where Mr X was legally allowed to park. The Council apologised for this. The Council also cancelled the CPNs that were issued to Mr X.
  3. An investigation is not justified as it would not lead to a different outcome. This is because the Council has already recognised it provided incorrect information to Mr X and accepted this likely added to the dispute over the boundary. The Council has also cancelled the CPNs, and an investigation would not lead to any further recommendations.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings