London Borough of Enfield (21 002 595)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Jul 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of his complaints of noise nuisance and anti-social behaviour by his neighbour. We will not investigate the complaint because an investigation is unlikely to add to that already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Mr X, complains that despite his continued efforts and contact with the Council about a noisy neighbour, the problem continues and he wants it to stop.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I gave Mr X the opportunity to comment on my draft decision and considered what he said.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X has complained to the Council about noisy neighbours on numerous occasions. It has investigated his concerns and spoken to the neighbour. However, it has explained to Mr X that it has no grounds to take enforcement action. This is because the properties involved are privately owned and it cannot take action in relation to poor sound insulation or what amounts to normal everyday living noise.
  2. While this is clearly disappointing for Mr X, an investigation by the Ombudsman is unlikely to add to that already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because an investigation is unlikely to add to that already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings