Northumberland County Council (26 017 219)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s conduct during an appeal to a tribunal. This is because the law prevents us from considering complaints about a council’s conduct during an appeal to a tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains about the Council’s administrative failings during a Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal (SEND) appeal. She says the Council’s failings caused her significant and avoidable distress. Mrs X wants the Council to acknowledge its failings, apologise, review and strengthen its administrative process and implement cover arrangements for staff absences.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.
  4. We cannot investigate the council’s conduct during an appeal. This includes anything a complainant could have raised with the tribunal at any stage of the appeal, or which the tribunal has considered on its own initiative, or which could have been a part of the tribunal’s deliberations in resolving the appeal. (R v Local Commissioner ex parte Bradford [1979]) and R (on application of Milburn) v Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman [2023] EWCA Civ 207)  
  5. The courts have said we can decide not to investigate a complaint about any action by an organisation concerning a matter which the law says we cannot investigate. (R (on the application of M) v Commissioner for Local Administration [2006] EHWCC 2847 (Admin))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint. When someone has appealed to a tribunal, the law prevents us from considering the matter appealed or related issues. The courts have decided this includes a council’s conduct during the appeal process and information it provided to the tribunal. The way the Council conducted itself during the appeal process is a matter for the Tribunal. It makes case management directions, has powers to deal with non-compliance, and can make costs orders. 

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because the law prevents us from considering complaints about a council’s conduct during an appeal to the SEND Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings