Bristol City Council (26 010 024)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 10 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s delay in completing Miss X’s son’s Education, Health and Care Plan annual review. This is because the Council has offered Miss X £400 and this provides a suitable remedy for the injustice caused by the delay.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council took too long to complete the annual review of her son’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan. She says the four-month delay affected her right of appeal against its decision not to amend the Plan and caused distress, uncertainty and frustration. She says she also spent time and trouble chasing the Council for updates and complaining.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council accepts it delayed in completing Miss X’s son’s annual review and has offered Miss X £400. The amount is broadly consistent with the remedies we have recommended in other similar cases and our Guidance on Remedies.
  2. I appreciate Miss X does not consider the Council’s offer is sufficient but I am satisfied it provides a suitable remedy for the impact of the Council’s delay. I will not therefore investigate the matter further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the Council has provided a suitable remedy for the delay in completing Miss X’s son’s EHC Plan annual review and it is therefore unlikely investigation will achieve significantly more for Miss X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings