Essex County Council (25 030 699)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about educational provision and placements because it was reasonable for Ms X to use her right to appeal to the First-Tier (Special Educational Needs and Disability) Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council failed to properly consider her requested amendments to her child’s (Y) Education, Health and Care (EHC) plan. She also says the Council consulted schools using an inaccurate plan and has named an unsuitable school placement.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Parents who are unhappy with the contents of an EHC Plan have a right to appeal to the Tribunal. It is the mechanism set up by Parliament for parents to challenge such decisions. The Tribunal can direct changes to the EHC plan. We expect parents to use this right unless it is not reasonable for them to do so.
  2. Y has an EHC Plan maintained by the Council. Ms X is unhappy with the provision and setting provided by the Council. Section F and Section I of an EHC Plan specify the provision and placement and are appealable to the Tribunal. It would have been reasonable for Ms X to appeal to the Tribunal if she was unhappy with the content of the EHC plan. Therefore, we cannot investigate Ms X’s complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because Ms X has the right to appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) and it would be reasonable for her to do so.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings