Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about delays in the Education Health and Care Plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to apologise to Mr X and pay him £100 per month for the delay. We consider this an appropriate remedy and further investigation is therefore unlikely to achieve anything more.

The complaint

1. Miss X complains the Council failed to complete the Education, Health and Care (EHC) needs assessment process for his son, Y, in accordance with the statutory deadlines. Mr X requested an assessment on 6 May 2025 but the Council has not yet completed the process or decided whether to issue Y an EHC Plan. 

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

2. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. Service failure can happen when an organisation fails to provide a service as it should have done because of circumstances outside its control. We do not need to show any blame, intent, flawed policy or process, or bad faith by an organisation to say service failure (fault) has occurred. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1), as amended)
3. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

4. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
5. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
6. Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

Back to top

My assessment

7. There are timescales for each stage of the EHC needs assessment process. Councils must consider requests for assessments and decide if they will carry out an assessment within six weeks. They then have a further 10 weeks to decide if they will issue an EHC Plan and if they decide to issue a Plan, they have a further four weeks to finalise it. The whole process must not exceed 20 weeks. 
8. In this case the Council considered Mr X’s request for an assessment but decided it was not necessary. Mr X challenged this decision and the Council agreed to carry out an assessment on 8 September 2025. We cannot consider any delay caused by the original decision, as this carried a right of appeal to a Tribunal, so I have focused my attention on the time taken by the Council to complete the process after 8 September 2025.
9. Once the Council decided to carry out an assessment it should have completed the process and told Mr X if it intended to issue Y an EHC Plan by 17 November 2025. If it decided to issue a Plan, it should have finalised this by 15 December 2025. But to date the Council has not reached a decision about whether to issue Y an EHC Plan.
10. The Council has accepted delay in completing Y’s assessment and deciding whether to issue him an EHC Plan. It has explained that a lack of Educational Psychologists has contributed to the delay. The failure to issue a decision amounts to service failure.
11. We are satisfied the Council is taking action to deal with the issues caused by a lack of Educational Psychologists. In response to our findings in a previous case it sent us an action plan of its service improvements.
12. We do however accept the Council’s delays caused Mr X and Y frustration and uncertainty and that this injustice remains unremedied. We have therefore invited the Council to provide a remedy to Mr X and Y and the Council, to its credit, has agreed to our proposal.

Back to top

Agreed actions

13. The Council has agreed to the following actions to remedy Mr X’s complaint:
14. Apologise to Mr X for the delay in the EHC Plan process;
15. Pay Mr X £100 for each month of delay to date and for a maximum of six months from the date of this decision (until 20 January 2027).
16. If the Council decides to issue an EHC Plan the delay should remedy should be calculated from 15 December 2025. If the Council decides not to issue a plan, the remedy should be calculated from 17 November 2025.
17. The Council will make this payment within four weeks of issuing Mr X the EHC Plan, notifying him of its decision not to issue an EHC Plan, or from 20 January 2027 (whichever comes first).
18. I consider the remedy agreed by the Council is suitable and that it is taking steps to address the issue at the heart of this complaint. It is therefore unlikely investigation would achieve anything more for Mr X.
19. In the event the delay continues beyond 20 January 2027 we would expect Mr X to make a new complaint to the Council. Once the complaint has exhausted the Council’s complaints process, and in the event Mr X remains unhappy, he may refer the complaint to us and we will consider whether to investigate it further. As part of this process we would consider if any further delays were due to the national shortage of Educational Psychologists or from issues elsewhere in the process. This may then warrant a further remedy.

Back to top

Final decision

20. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the Council has agreed a suitable remedy for the injustice caused by its delay.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman