Surrey County Council (25 027 701)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the school named in an Education, Health and Care Plan. Mrs X has appealed to a Tribunal and so the law says we cannot investigate.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council named an unsuitable school in her child’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan and then revoked the decision weeks later to name Mrs X’s preferred school. Mrs X says the decision to name a mainstream school was made dishonourably and reports from professionals were overlooked. Mrs X requests the Council reimburse her with the fees she paid to her preferred school before the Council revoked its decision.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the Tribunal in this decision statement.
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  4. Due to the restrictions on our powers to investigate where there is an appeal right, there will be cases where there has been past injustice which neither we, nor the Tribunal, can remedy. The courts have found that the fact a complainant will be left without a remedy does not mean we can investigate a complaint. (R (ER) v Commissioner for Local Administration, ex parte Field) 1999 EWHC 754 (Admin). 

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council named a mainstream school in Mrs X’s child’s EHC Plan and the placement was due to begin in September 2025. Mrs X appealed this decision to the Tribunal. Mrs X’s preference was for her child to attend School B. She paid the relevant fee for one term for her child to attend School B from September 2025. In October 2025, the Council revoked its decision and amended the EHC Plan to name School B, Mrs X’s preferred placement.
  2. We cannot investigate this complaint. The courts have established that if someone has appealed to the Tribunal, the law says we cannot investigate any matter which was part of, was connected to, or could have been part of, the appeal to the Tribunal. For this reason, we cannot investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint because she has appealed to the Tribunal and so the law says we cannot investigate.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings