Hertfordshire County Council (25 024 026)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council failed to secure educational provision for the complainant’s child. The complaint has already been substantially upheld and our intervention would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mrs X, complains that the Council failed to secure appropriate educational and special educational provision for her child.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X’s child has an Education Health and Care plan, which was issued in September 2025. Mrs X complains that the Council subsequently failed to secure provision for her child, resulting in a period when she was not accessing education. She says this had a detrimental impact on her daughter’s wellbeing, and her own. The Council has accepted that it was at fault but Mrs X says it has failed to provide an appropriate remedy.
  2. The complaint correspondence demonstrates that the Council directed two schools to offer a place to Mrs X’s child in September and November 2025. It accepts that it failed to secure appropriate education between September and January 2026, and that its communication with Mrs X was flawed.
  3. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. It has already been substantially upheld. That being the case, our intervention would amount to reinvestigation of matters which have already been determined. The financial remedy totalling £2600 is broadly in line with the Ombudsman’s guidance and is a reasonable and proportionate outcome in the circumstances of the complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because investigation would not lead to a different outcome

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings