What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Surrey County Council (25 021 059)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 03 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s consultations with secondary schools for Mrs X’s child. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council sent an out-of-date Education, Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan) to secondary schools during consultations for her child, along with poor communication from the Council and unsatisfactory and confusing complaint responses.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)
  2. Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The first complaint response from the Council said it could not deal with Mrs X’s complaint as the concerns raised were about the EHC Plan which was going to Tribunal.
  2. Mrs X brought her complaint to the Ombudsman and we asked the Council to carry out a stage two investigation.
  3. To its credit the stage two response from the Council was thorough, apologising for the fault and making good service improvements to ensure this does not happen again.
  4. However, if we investigated this complaint it is likely we would find the Council at fault because it did not know which version of the EHC Plan had been sent to schools, there was delay, issues with record keeping and poor communication with Mrs X.
  5. The Council offered a symbolic payment of £100 so we asked it to consider remedying this by paying Mrs X £200 for distress and £150 for time and trouble, within one month of this decision.

Back to top

Agreed action

  1. To its credit the Council agreed to resolve the complaint and it will pay Mrs X £350 as stated in paragraph nine.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings