London Borough of Islington (25 016 897)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council failing to provide special educational provision to her child. Mrs X has already used her right of appeal about this and other matters to a tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council failed to provide Section F provison when her child was out of school from September 2024 until June 2025.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued Mrs X’s child’s Education, Health, and Care (EHC) Plan in July 2024. Mrs X appealed the named school, saying her child could not attend a mainstream school because the environment was unsuitable.
  2. The provisions in Section F were to be provided at the named school, which Mrs X was also appealing. There was no separate Speech and Language therapy or Occupational Therapy in the EHC Plan.
  3. The courts have established that if someone has appealed to the Tribunal, the law says we cannot investigate any matter which was part of, was connected to, or could have been part of, the appeal to the Tribunal. (R (on application of Milburn) v Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman [2023] EWCA Civ 207)

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint because she has used her right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal about the special educational provision.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings