Hertfordshire County Council (25 016 158)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of an Education Health and Care plan. This is because it would have been reasonable for the complainant to use her right of appeal to the First-Tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability).

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mrs X, complains about the Council’s handling of her child’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) plan. She says this matter has caused her and her family significant stress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued an Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan in July 2025. Mrs X says a specialist setting is her preference, but the Council has named a mainstream setting. She also says specialist provision in section F of the EHC plan is not sufficient to meet her child’s needs. Mrs X says the Council has not considered evidence from professionals in determining the EHC plan.
  2. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. This is because it would have been reasonable for Mrs X to use her right of appeal to the Tribunal if she was dissatisfied with her child’s EHC plan. The Council reminded Mrs X of her appeal right during the complaints process.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it would have been reasonable to expect her to use her right of appeal to the Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings