Kent County Council (25 010 128)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to provide education to her child between December 2023 to July 2024 because it is late. We will not investigate delays in the Council’s complaint handling because it does not meet the tests in our assessment code.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council:
      1. failed to provide alternative education for her child, Y, when they were permanently excluded from their school in December 2023;
      2. failed to deliver the content of her child’s EHC Plan between December 2023 and July 2024; and
      3. delayed responding to her complaints.
  2. Mrs X said the matter caused her frustration and distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained to the Council in February 2024. The Council did not respond to Ms X until 12 months later in February 2025. Ms X escalated her complaint, and the Council sent its final response in April 2025.
  2. Ms X brought her complaint to the Ombudsman in August 2025. The matters Ms X complained about happened more than 12 months before she brought her complaint to the Ombudsman. The complaint is therefore late.
  3. The law says we cannot investigate matters older than 12 months unless we decide there are good reasons. While the Council’s response to Ms X was delayed in 2024, it was open to Ms X to approach the Ombudsman at any time in 2024 when she did not receive a response from the Council.
  4. Ms X also did not approach the Ombudsman immediately following the Council’s final response. A further four months passed.
  5. Consequently, I have seen no good reasons Ms X could not have approached the Ombudsman sooner, and so we will not investigate.
  6. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s delayed complaint response because it is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaint handling where we do not investigate the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it is late. We will not investigate the Council’s complaint handling because it does not meet the tests in our assessment code.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings