Summary: We have upheld this complaint about the Council’s failure to complete an Education Health and Care Needs Assessment for Miss X’s child within the statutory timescale. The Council has agreed to provide a proportionate remedy and this removes the need for us to investigate.

The complaint

1. Miss X complains about delay in the Education Health and Care (EHC) Plan process.  She says the Council has failed to meet the relevant timescales in the SEN Code of Practice

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

3. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
4. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
5. Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

Back to top

My assessment

6. Miss X applied for an EHC Plan for her child on 16 December 2024. The Council initially declined to assess but reversed its decision and agreed to carry out an assessment on 21 February 2025. The Council should have completed the assessment process and told Miss X if it intended to issue a plan within 10 weeks of this decision, by 2 May 2025.  If the Council decided to issue an EHC Plan it should have done so by 30 May 2025 September 2025.

The Council has not yet completed the process and has attributed the delay in part to the lack of educational psychology resource. Its failure to complete the process in-time amounts to service failure.

7. We are satisfied that the Council has a plan in place to address the lack of specialist advice. In response to our findings in a previous case it sent us an action plan of its service improvements.
8. We do however accept the Council’s delays caused Miss X and her child frustration and uncertainty and that this injustice remains unremedied. We have therefore invited the Council to provide a remedy to Miss X and the Council, to its credit, has agreed to our proposal.

Back to top

Agreed action

9. The Council has agreed to the following actions to remedy the complaint:
• Apologise to Miss X for the delay in the EHC Plan process;
• Pay Miss X £100 for each month of delay to date and for a maximum of six months from the date of this decision. If the Council decides to issue an EHC Plan the delay should remedy should be calculated from 30 May 2025. If the Council decides not to issue a plan, the remedy should be calculated from 2 May 2025.
10. The Council will make this payment within four weeks of issuing Miss X the EHC Plan, notifying her of its decision not to issue an EHC Plan, or from 3 May 2026 (whichever comes first).
11. In the event the delay continues beyond 3 May 2026 we would expect Miss X to make a new complaint to the Council. Once the complaint has exhausted the Council’s complaints process, and in the event Miss X remains unhappy, she may refer the complaint to us and we will consider whether to investigate it further.
12. I consider the remedy agreed by the Council is suitable and that it is taking steps to address the issue at the heart of this complaint. It is therefore unlikely investigation would achieve anything more for Miss X.

Back to top

Final decision

13. We have upheld this complaint. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint by providing a proportionate remedy to the injustice caused to Miss X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman