Birmingham City Council (25 006 448)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to change the Special Educational Needs and Disability tribunal lead for her case. This is because the issue concerns the Council’s handling of Mrs X’s appeal and if she has concerns about any information provided by the council officer it would be reasonable to expect her to raise her concerns with the Tribunal

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council did not change the Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) tribunal lead for a tribunal hearing when she asked it to.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the Tribunal in this decision statement.
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X raised concerns about the tribunal lead with the Council, saying they were not good at their job and dishonest.
  2. The Council said Mrs X’s allegations were unsubstantiated and it would not change the tribunal lead.
  3. If Mrs X believes the tribunal lead had been dishonest or provided inaccurate information that could affect the outcome of the tribunal case, she could or should have raised this with the Tribunal during the hearing. It would then be for the Tribunal to decide whether to accept the Council’s evidence or question it further. We cannot decide whether the tribunal lead’s involvement affected the outcome of Mrs X’s appeal, and we have no power to overturn its decision. We also cannot say the Council should have allocated a different officer to the case as it is not our role to determine staffing decisions.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it would be reasonable for her to raise any concerns she has about the Council’s handling of her appeal and the accuracy of any information it provides, with the SEND Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings