Kent County Council (24 001 791)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council taking child protection action concerning Miss X’s child. The matters complained of are not separable from matters that were or could reasonably have been raised during court action.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained via a representative that the Council failed to offer alternative educational provision when her child was unable to attend school. She said it failed to carry out appropriate assessments and fabricated information that led to it making the child subject to a child protection plan rather than meeting the child’s special educational needs. She said the Council failed to support her and her partner as carers, or to make reasonable adjustments.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  4. We have the power to start or end an investigation into a complaint about actions the law allows us to investigate. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been mentioned as part of the legal proceedings regarding a closely related matter. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. There is a fundamental disagreement between Miss X and her partner and the Council about the nature of her child’s needs and her parenting. The Council has confirmed there has been a recent interim supervision order concerning the child, and that court action is ongoing. The existence of a court order regarding the care of Miss X’s child means the matters Miss X complains of are closely related to matters that were or could reasonably have formed part of court action. They are thus affected by the absolute and permanent legal bar that prevents us from investigating matters subject to court action, regardless of which party initiates the court action.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint because they are not separable from matters that were or could have been raised in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings