Northumberland County Council (23 015 451)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about failings by the Council in arranging a school placement for Ms X’s child. Ms X has now accepted a remedy for fault offered by the Council. Therefore, further investigation would not now lead to a worthwhile outcome.

The complaint

  1. Ms X said there was fault by the Council in arranging a school placement for her child during the final stages on an Education Health and Care assessment in the summer of 2023. She said the Council left her unaware of its intentions, and she only discovered this when a representative of the intended school was present at a virtual meeting. She said a letter that purported to be before the virtual meeting was misdated and the Council failed to respond to questions posed by her solicitor.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Since Ms X approached us, the Council has accepted it failed to respond properly to her complaint and that a letter to Ms X was mis-dated. The implication of its acceptance was that Ms X was unaware of the purpose of the virtual meeting in advance. It offered her £500 for her time and trouble in having to approach the Ombudsman to resolve this issue. Ms X told me she had accepted the remedy offered.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because doing so would not lead to a worthwhile outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings