Essex County Council (23 012 503)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Dec 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the school placement of Miss X’s child. She had a right of appeal to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal it would be reasonable to use when the Council declined to name the school she preferred in Section I of the child’s Education Health and Care Plan. We cannot act in a supplementary role to that of the Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Miss X said her child’s mainstream school placement is unsuitable. She said she gave her school preference at a review of the Education Health and Care (EHC) Plan a year ago, but the Council has not agreed to move her child to the school she prefers.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Where a child has an EHC Plan and a council declines to name the parental school preference in Section I, there is a right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal. Miss X had a right of appeal it would have been reasonable to use. She would have the same right again if she made a further request and the Council again declined to name her school preference.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because she has and had an alternative remedy available by way of an appeal to the SEND Tribunal that it would be reasonable to use.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings