Central Bedfordshire Council (23 009 225)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Oct 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council refusing to issue Mrs X’s daughter with an Education Health and Care Plan. It was reasonable for the complainant to appeal the Council’s initial decision to a tribunal. Mrs X then used her appeal rights. The complaint is outside our jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Mrs X, complained the Council twice refused to issue her daughter with an Education Health and Care Plan.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint.
  2. Parents unhappy with a council’s decision not to issue an EHC Plan can appeal to the SEND Tribunal. We expect people to use this right unless we consider it unreasonable for them to do so.
  3. When the Council first refused Mrs X’s request, she had the right to appeal the Council’s decision. Mrs X says the Council’s decision was unlawful. But that is a decision for the Tribunal, not the Ombudsman. The Tribunal could have decided if the Council should assess Mrs X’s daughter for an EHC Plan. That is not a decision we can take. It was therefore reasonable for Mrs X to appeal and so we will not consider this issue.
  4. When the Council refused Mrs X’s second request for an EHC Plan, she appealed to the SEND Tribunal. When a parent uses their right of appeal, we have no jurisdiction to consider the complaint from the point the appeal rights were available until the Tribunal issued its decision. We cannot consider any related matters. This point is outside our jurisdiction with no discretion to investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it was reasonable for Mrs X to appeal to a tribunal. Mrs X then used her appeal rights which places the matter outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings