London Borough of Hillingdon (22 012 089)
Category : Education > Special educational needs
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 16 Jan 2023
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council managed a child’s education and Special Educational Needs provision. This is because the complaint is made late, and I see no good reason to exercise discretion and investigate it now.
The complaint
- The complainant, who I will call Mr X, complains about how the Council managed his child’s education and Special Educational Needs (SEN) provision. Mr X says the Council’s actions meant that his son went without a suitable full-time education for four years.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Mr X complained to the Council via his advocate in 2020. The Council responded and advised Mr X how he could escalate his complaint to stage two.
- I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is made late, and I see no good reason why he could not have raised it sooner. It is reasonable to have expected Mr X to escalate his complaint with the Council when it responded in 2020, if he had he would then have been advised how to escalate his complaint to the Ombudsman.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is made late, and I see no reason why he could not have complained sooner.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman