Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council naming a school on Mr X’s child’s Education Health and Care Plan that is too far away. Mr X has used his right to appeal to the SEND Tribunal and the matters complained of are not separable from that.

The complaint

1. Mr X said the Council ignored medical advice in naming a school that was too far away. He said doctors could not attend a Tribunal hearing and he lost the appeal.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

4. I considered information provided by the complainant and considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

5. The complaint concerns the school named in Section I of an Education Health and Care (EHC) Plan. Thus, it is not separable from matters where Mr X used his right to appeal to the SEND Tribunal. The Ombudsman cannot function as a review chamber for the SEND Tribunal.

Back to top

Final decision

6. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the matters complained of are not separable from those in respect of which Mr X has used his right to appeal to the SEND Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman