London Borough of Barnet (21 008 385)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Sep 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint that the Council has failed to do what it agreed following a previous complaint to us. There is insufficient evidence of fault or injustice to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Miss X said the Council failed to provide the remedy it agreed after we found fault in complaint 19 011 750.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. The complainant now has an opportunity to comment on my draft decision. I have considered her comments before making a final decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Part of the remedy the Council agreed to provide to resolve the matters in complaint 19 011 750 was £2400 for the educational benefit of Miss X’s son. She complained the named support worker the Council had agreed to provide to help her son adjust to his new college was leaving and that her son would not attend college without him being present. The Council has told us it had recently written to Miss X confirming that the £2400 is paying for 80 hours of support by the named worker to help her son adjust to his new college. While Miss X wanted the money used otherwise, a difference of opinion is not evidence of fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault or injustice to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings