London Borough of Enfield (26 012 596)
Category : Education > School transport
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 04 Aug 2026
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a child’s eligibility for home to school travel assistance. The complaint is late, and it was reasonable for Ms X to have complained to us sooner.
The complaint
- Ms X complained the Council decided her child did not meet the criteria for home to school travel assistance.
- Ms X said this caused distress and financial hardship.
- Ms X wants the Council to reimburse her for the costs she incurred transporting her child to and from school for three years and offer a symbolic financial remedy to recognise the time and trouble Ms X experienced pursuing the matter.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Ms X.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- The 12-month period runs from the day the person affected had notice of the matters alleged in the complaint i.e. the actions complained about.
- Ms X was aware of the Council’s decision that her child was not eligible for home to school transport assistance in 2023 and appealed it at the time.
- We will not investigate this complaint. The complaint is late, and it was reasonable to expect Ms X to have complained to us sooner.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it is late, and it was reasonable to expect her to have complained to us sooner.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman